
By Diane E. McDowell
There are moments when another person's response starts to feel like information about us.
They don't choose us.
They don't understand what we're saying.
They stop seeing something in us they once seemed to see easily.
They criticize something we thought was good.
They leave.
And almost without noticing it, the question can move.
It starts as:
What happened between us?
And becomes:
What does this say about me?
Those are very different questions.
One is about an interaction between two people.
The other turns someone's response into evidence about your worth.
I explain this with a drawing I've used on a board for years.
Two circles.
A person inside each one.
And above both people, the same words:
100% LOVABLE.
100% VALUABLE.
100% WORTHY.
Not when they're behaving well.
Not when someone understands them.
Not because their relationship is working, they're successful, or another person recognizes what they bring.
Already.
Completely.
Lovable, valuable, and worthy.
The question isn't whether one person can give those things to the other.
They don't.
The question is what happens when one person's ability to recognize or respond to what's there begins to look like evidence about the other person's worth.
There's another distinction I sometimes add to the drawing.
Lovable.
And:
Love-ability.
They sound almost identical.
They aren't.
Lovable describes something I believe is already true about you.
Love-ability describes my ability to love you.
And that ability is affected by many things.
My history, my preferences, what I understand, what I can tolerate, what I'm able to recognize, and what I have room for in a particular moment.
You can be 100% lovable even when my ability to love you is limited.
Both are true at the same time.
That's an important distinction because otherwise my ability to love you can begin to look like evidence of how lovable you are.
It isn't.
My love-ability tells us something about me.
It does not establish your lovability.
Two people can encounter the same person and come away with very different impressions.
What feels warm and engaging to one person may feel like too much to another. Directness might be appreciated by someone who values it and uncomfortable for someone who doesn't.
Even thoughtfulness can be recognized immediately by one person and barely noticed by another.
The difference isn't necessarily in the person being observed.
It's also in who's doing the looking.
Their history, preferences, and what they value all influence what they notice, how they interpret it, and what they're able to appreciate.
That doesn't mean other people's perceptions are always wrong.
Someone may notice something about us that we've missed. Their feedback can tell us how our behavior affects them, including when something we've done has caused hurt.
That's information worth considering.
But another person's ability—or inability—to recognize our worth is not what creates it.


Your worth doesn't change with someone else's ability to see it.
I sometimes use an imperfect analogy to make this distinction.
A Bugatti car can cost millions of dollars.
I can look at it and say, “I would never pay that.”
I might not care about the engineering or value what makes the car unusual, or I might simply prefer something else.
My response tells you something about my valuation of the car.
It doesn't determine the car's market value.
Human worth is not market value, and people are not objects with price tags.
That's where the analogy ends.
The useful part is much narrower:
My ability to recognize or value something is not what creates the thing I'm looking at.
Someone can fail to recognize something that's there.
They may decide that what you bring isn't what they're looking for. Or misunderstand you entirely.
Even someone who knows you well can still see you through the limits of their own perspective.
Their perception is real.
It just isn't the source of your worth.
It's one thing to say that a stranger's opinion doesn't determine your worth.
Most of us can accept that fairly easily.
It gets more complicated when the person matters.
A partner.
A parent.
A child.
A close friend.
Or someone whose opinion you've trusted, who once seemed to see you clearly.
Their response carries more weight because the relationship carries more weight.
If they pull away, criticize, reject, or stop recognizing something in you, it's harder to leave their perception on their side of the interaction.
You can begin looking at yourself through their eyes.
Maybe they're right. Maybe I am difficult to love, or I don't bring what I thought I brought. And if I were different, perhaps they'd see me differently.
Sometimes there is something worth examining.
But examining yourself and putting your worth on trial are not the same thing.
Someone tells you that you interrupted them. Look at whether you did.
If they say they don't feel heard around you, pay attention to what happens in those conversations.
And when someone tells you they don't want the relationship, believe them without trying to change their mind.
They have the right to decide that what you offer isn't what they're looking for. You don't have to argue them out of it.
None of that requires the conclusion:
Therefore, there is something wrong with my worth.
This distinction matters because protecting your worth doesn't require dismissing every piece of information you don't like.
That's not what I'm suggesting.
You are completely worthy and still have things to learn.
Being lovable doesn't mean you never have an impact you didn't intend.
And being valuable doesn't mean you'll always be the person someone chooses.
Your worth does not require you to be beyond feedback.
And feedback does not require you to renegotiate your worth.
When another person's perception starts carrying too much authority, the way you communicate begins to change.
You explain more.
Soften something you would normally say simply.
Start watching their face while you're talking.
More evidence comes into the conversation. Another version of the same point.
And gradually, your attention shifts toward whether they understand you and away from whether what you're saying is actually true for you.
They might understand more by the end of the conversation. They might not.
But something has changed in the process.
That's different from communicating clearly or caring about another person's experience.
It's reorganizing yourself around getting them to see you differently.
This is where the distinction between Capacity and Access becomes useful.
Something can remain true while becoming harder to reach.
Your worth doesn't have to disappear for you to lose contact with it.
There are moments when you know, intellectually, that another person's response doesn't determine your worth—and still find that knowing difficult to reach.
Then later, something changes.
The conversation is over.
There is some distance.
You wake up the next morning.
And what felt uncertain becomes obvious again.
Of course that doesn't determine who I am.
That doesn't mean your worth left and came back.
It means your access to what was already true changed.
There is another part of the drawing that matters.
Both circles say the same thing.
Both people are 100% lovable.
Both are 100% valuable.
Both are 100% worthy.
That includes the person who misunderstood you.
The person who didn't choose you.
The person whose ability to love you was limited.
The person whose perception of you was different from your perception of yourself.
Their worth doesn't depend on your ability to see or love them perfectly either.
This isn't:
I'm worthy, and you're the person who failed to recognize it.
Their limitations don't make them less worthy.
Yours don't make you less worthy.
Two completely worthy people can hurt each other, misunderstand each other, have very different capacities for loving one another, be wrong for each other, disagree about what happened, or reach the end of a relationship.
None of those outcomes requires either person's worth to have changed.
Relationships change.
Perceptions change.
Our ability to love one another can change.
Someone who once recognized something in you may stop recognizing it.
Someone who couldn't see something before may eventually see it clearly.
Sometimes you'll understand why.
Sometimes you won't.
There may be information in another person's response that matters, something for you to examine, or nothing for you to do with it at all.
But underneath all of that, I come back to the same drawing.
Two people.
Both 100% lovable.
Both 100% valuable.
Both 100% worthy.
Neither person's worth being created by the other person's ability to recognize it.
Your worth doesn't increase when someone recognizes it.
It doesn't decrease when they don't.
Their ability to see it can change.
Their ability to love you can change.
Your worth doesn't.
© 2026 Diane E. McDowell. All rights reserved.